Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) against Venezuela

A secret document of the US Army National Ground Intelligence Center, recently declassified in part, confirms that the Pentagon's most powerful team for psychological operations is employing its forces against Venezuela.

A secret document of the US
Army National Ground Intelligence Center, recently declassified in
part, through the application of the US Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), confirms that the Pentagon's most powerful team for
psychological operations is employing its forces against Venezuela.1 The
document, dating from the year 2006, analyses the border situation
between Colombia and Venezuela. It was drafted by the US Army's 4th
Psychological Operations Group (Airborne) (4th PSYOP Group (A) or 4th
POG) and the US Army National Ground Intelligence Center, a fact that
thus reaffirms that the same psychological warfare team operates in the
region against Venezuela.

The small part of the text of
the secret document which was left uncensored explains how the Plan
Patriot (previously known as Plan Colombia) has successfully pushed the
activities of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia ((FARC),
Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia) into Venezuelan territory.
It is explicitly being emphasized in the secret document that

"…the offensive operations of
Plan Patriot and its counterparts of the Colombian military have had an
important impact on the activities of the Eastern Bloc [of the
FARC]…due to the success achieved against some fronts of the Eastern
Bloc in Colombia, several fronts of the Eastern Bloc are conducting
more combat and regenerated their activities at the
Colombian-Venezuelan border. The Mini-Blocs in the Llanos and the
eastern zone… have assumed distinct strategic roles in response to the
Plan Patriot 2B…"

The arrival of the US Army's
4th Psychological Operations Group (Airborne) in Colombia in the year
2006 and the strategy of pushing the FARC and the Colombian civil
conflict into Venezuelan territory cannot be taken as a coincidence;
for it is exactly the moment when the US State Department and the
Pentagon also started to publicly accuse Venezuela of collaborating
with terrorism, specifically by referring to alleged dealings with the
FARC. In the first semester of 2006 Washington added Venezuela to a
list of "countries that do not fully collaborate in the struggle
against terrorism", and then imposed sanctions against the South
American country that resulted in the prohibition of the sales of arms
from the United States and from any international company that uses US
technology. The 2006 report of the US State Department said,

"The Secretary of State
certified Venezuela as "not fully cooperating" with U.S. antiterrorism
efforts… It remained unclear to what extent the Government of
Venezuela provided material support to Colombian terrorists, if it did,
and on which level…" (Report of the US State Department of 2006,
available at www.state.gov)2

A few months later,
in July 2006, the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on
International Terrorism and Nonproliferation, held a hearing titled "Venezuela: Terrorism Hub of South America?", in which they declared that

"Venezuela, under President
Hugo Chavez, has tolerated terrorists on its soil and has forged close
relationships with officially designated state sponsors of terrorism:
Cuba, Iran and North Korea. Colombian terrorist groups use Venezuelan
territory for safe haven…".3

At the same time, the
international press started to promote a matrix of opinion, associating
Venezuela with terrorism. Articles and editorials published by the
Washington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Times, the Wall
Street Journal, El País of Spain, El Tiempo of Bogota, and the Miami
Herald, amongst others, repeated time and again [affirmations about]
the alleged link between the Venezuelan government and the FARC in
Colombia, although they never provided any conclusive proof. All the
evidences were based on "anonymous" sources, "high-level officials in
Washington", and "analysts", without giving any concrete names, data or


The US Army's 4th Psychological Operations Group (Airborne) is the only active psychological operations unit.4  It
comprises 1.300 officials and constitutes 26% of all US Army
psychological operation units, the remaining 74% consist of reservists.
By the year 2011, it is foreseen that the unit would eventually grow to
approximately 2.300 troops who are experts in psychological operations.
The official mission of the 4th Psychological Operations Group
(Airborne) is to deploy anywhere in the world on short notice to plan,
develop and conduct psychological operations and "Civil Affairs" (in
other words, subversion) in support of coalition forces and
Washington's government agencies.

The personnel of the 4th Group
include regional experts and linguists who have a profound
understanding of the political, cultural, ethnic, and religious
subtleties of the target audience. They are also experts in technical
areas such as journalism, radio operations, graphic design, newspaper
business, illustration, and long-range tactical communications.

In 2003, the 4th Psychological
Operations Group (Airborne) of the US Army inaugurated an installation
for media operations of the Special Operations Forces (SOP) at a cost
of US$ 8.1 million. Said installation is known as the Pentagon's
production center for all its psychological operations and their
"products", like flyers, pamphlets, posters, and segments for
television and radio transmission that are all aimed at persuading and
winning the minds and hearts of those who the Pentagon wants to attack.
For example, more than 150 million flyers and pamphlets – all produced
and printed in the installation of the Group 4th Psychological
Operations Group (Airborne) – have been disseminated throughout Iraq
and Afghanistan. Colonel James Treadwell, Commander of the 4th Group,
emphasized that more than 16.000 hours of messages for radio
transmission were produced by his group and transmitted in Afghanistan
and more than 4.000 in Iraq. The printer's in the new installation has
a capacity to print more than 1 million pamphlets per day.

The psychological operations
troops study techniques in "marketing" and publicity before they design
their "products". They also analyze in detail their impact and results.
They are complete experts in propaganda and in the best ways to exert
influence on public opinion so as to promote their agenda. In 2005,
said unit of "propaganda warriors" was expanded through the foundation
of the Joint Psychological Operations Support Element (JPOSE), with
Colonel Treadwell being in command of the entire joint team.
Transferred from Iraq to the headquarters of JPOSE in Tampa, Florida,
Colonel Treadwell began to focus his propaganda activities towards the
South. In press statements Treadwell confirmed that his new elite team
for psychological operations would direct a part of the work to Bolivia
and Venezuela. A little later, a contract (worth up to US$ 100 million)
was awarded to the company, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
to help design the "campaigns" of psychological operations together
with JPOSE. Two other companies, Lincoln Group and SYColeman, also
received similar contracts financed through the team's budget, a budget
that surpasses US$ 8 billion per year.

From these companies, SAIC has
a pretty dirty past history in Venezuela. It was the company that,
together with PDVSA, the state owned petroleum industry, constructed a
mixed company named INTESA that began to automate the petroleum
industry in Venezuela in 1995. And INTESA was the same company that
executed one of the most brutal sabotage acts against the Venezuelan
industry at the end of the year 2002, with the intention to force
President Hugo Chávez out of power. The company was used as a platform
to attack the "brains of PDVSA" by destroying its entire data-base and
automated systems and converting it again into a manually operating
company. Their actions caused billions of dollars of damage to the
Venezuelan economy and its international reputation as a secure
petroleum provider and producer. Nevertheless, they did not reach their
objective to topple President Chávez, and little later INTESA was
closed and forced to cease their operations in the country. Three years
later, their new contracts appeared – to carry out psychological
operations against the same government they previously had tried to
neutralize without success.

Since the United States' most
powerful team of psychological operations is working actively against
Venezuela, the fruits of their work have been seen both on an
international level and also within the country on a national level.5 
President Chávez is already classified as "dictator" in international
public opinion and there are few who would doubt his alleged "dealings"
with the FARC in Colombia – despite the fact that there was never a
single proof offered that would confirm such "dealings".

Psychological operations are
considered by the Pentagon to be their "most powerful weapon" to date.
Through screens, broadcasting stations, newspapers, posters, design of
clothes and objects, they transmit their purposeful and well planned
message to subtly exert influence on public opinion and perceptions
about topics of interest. It is the new battlefield where all of us are
forced to assume a role, because nobody escapes from information and
communication in today's world. It is the struggle for truth and
justice against lies and manipulation. The decision to be either victim
or combatant within that asymmetric war is in the hands of each of us.
Don't be fooled.

Translator's notes:

  1. T.n.: For groundbreaking
    evidence on the extent to which the Bush administration illegally aided
    the opposition, influenced the Venezuelan military, and directly and
    indirectly supported the coup of April 2002, see Eva Golinger's
    outstanding investigation: The Chávez Code: Cracking U.S. Intervention in Venezuela. Havana, Cuban Book Institute, 2005. Available also in Spanish, Italian, and German language.

  2. T.n.: see http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2006/82735.htm
  3. T.n.: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Proliferation. 2006. VENEZUELA: TERRORISM HUB OF SOUTH AMERICA? Document available at The Center for International Policy's National Security Program
  4. T.n.: Concerning the information resumed in this and the following paragraph, and for further details please see Global Security
  5. T.n.: In this context we highly recommend to our Spanish-speaking readers the excellent documentary "Enjambre"
    (a Guarataro Films & Venezolana de Televisión Production) that
    analyses the Networking doctrine, the concept of Fourth Generation
    Warfare and its application in Venezuela. While we continue making
    every effort to help provide an English version of this documentary,
    here's our translation of the brief summary provided originally by Rebelión in Spanish language:

[…] Introduction: The concepts "Fourth Generation Warfare" and "Networking".

Past History: Parallels between the 2002 coup d'état in Venezuela and the coup against Allende.

Networking in Venezuela:
How Fourth Generation Warfare works in Venezuela. The opposition's
change in strategy. By 2006-2007, the opposition focuses on the
exploitation and manipulation of social and political problems. New
political actors appear. Media Warfare and Psychological Operations.
Assassination. Declarations of journalists about Chávez' death or
assassination. TV-series about the assassination of Chávez or a
[military] invasion in Venezuela. Parallels to the Chilean case. Plan
shattered in Venezuela.

Military encirclement: Plan Colombia, Plan Balboa, Paramilitaries and US military bases.

Examples of resistance struggles. Vietnam, Cuba, and Middle East.
Asymmetrical warfare and the reserves or militia. Civilian-military
union. April 13th. […]

Original Source in Spanish: Rebelión – Operaciones psicológicas contra Venezuela: Washington y su guerra contra la revolución bolivariana; published on March 5th, 2009.

© Translation Copyright 2009 by AxisofLogic.com

This article has been translated from Spanish into English by Iris Buehler and revised by Les Blough, who are members of Tlaxcala,
the network of translators for linguistic diversity. Both reside in
Venezuela. This material is available for republication as long as
reprints include verbatim copy of the article in its entirety,
respecting its integrity. Reprints must cite the author, the translator
& reviser and Axis of Logic as the original source including a "live link" to the article. Thank you!

Read her biography and contact the author: Eva Golinger

Contact the Translator: Iris Buehler