Financing Venezuela’s Communal Councils

A large number of Venezuelans do not understand the community councils as
transformative, seeing them simply as a means of accessing finance with which
to improve their communities. The corresponding mentality indicates something at
fault, some gap between the participatory ideology and Venezuelan reality.

By George Gabriel
Short URL

Peering through the metal gate she asks me
again, "Why do you want a Community Council? What is the reason?" The simplest
response, that we want to improve our community has twice already failed to
convince. The truth is I never expected to be really questioned as to "why",
and though reasons race through my head, each appears less likely than the last
to persuade such a staunch supporter of the Venezuelan opposition.

The truth is that alongside the thousands
of councils[1]
there already exist all sorts of neighbourhood organisations that do function;
ours has arranged security, maintenance, and some infrastructure improvements
like a back up water supply.

I tell her that with a Community Council we
would receive government money with which we could undertake major projects
without having to self-fund - my apartment paid the equivalent of one
month's wages as our contribution to the water storage facility. This is an
appeal to the lowest common denominator and it works. She wants a council for
the exact same reason and will now help us construct one. She is an important
member of the community and can help us hugely, but if this is such a success
why do I feel uncomfortable?

David Velásquez, Minister of Popular Power for
Participation and Social Development, declared in 2007, "We have the enormous
responsibility of going beyond those who want to convert the Community Councils
into instances for receiving and administering resources, or instances that
fail to realize that they (the councils) are a new form of state, of
government, a new form of society in construction."[2]
In a country where corruption and incompetence are serious problems,
participation is seen as a potential antidote, sidelining and replacing
ineffective, inefficient, or corrupt parts of the state. With the financial
crisis only temporarily contained by Venezuela's foreign reserves, the prospect
of reduced government revenues makes these concerns urgent. Yet if the logic is
clear, how do I know this argument will fail to convince?

The reality is that although
Velásquez aspires to a new participatory state, many exist to be "gone beyond."
A large number of Venezuelans do not understand the community councils as
transformative, seeing them simply as a means of accessing finance with which
to improve their communities. The results coming from councils have been
extremely varied,[3] and while it
may appear unsustainable, we should recognize community based development is
far from bad. This said, the corresponding mentality indicates something at
fault, some gap between the participatory ideology and Venezuelan reality. It
is in this gap that my response has fallen.

Popular conceptions
of the councils have a number of causes ranging from a major lack of information
concerning participatory ideology to the stagnation of the higher-level
participatory initiatives, the Councils for Local Public Planning.[4]
Yet the government of Hugo Chávez needs to recognize its role in the
precipitation of this perception. The ad hoc transfers of resources[5]
to Community Councils by central government that have taken place facilitate
the belief that money is available for the time being to those ready to grab
it. The Bolivarian government has thus actively undermined its own participatory
project. Participatory structures receiving ad hoc transfers do not represent
the kind of transformation of state Velásquez envisions, we generally do not
make sporadic transfers to police forces, civil services or militaries.

What's worse is that
where money is handed to communities in an ad hoc relationship, the situation
can rapidly turn clientelistic. The run up to the recent regional elections
seems to provide evidence of such a relation as on the 10th of
November, thirteen days before the elections, President Chávez handed over 140
million dollars worth of credit to just over 1,000 communal banks via a fund
for micro finance. Though the label "vote buying" is too crude for this
relationship, this is a rapid impact mode of governance, which is therefore
easily used for electoral purposes. This further undermines the Bolivarian
project by politicizing participation.

Fortunately the
majority of transfers are not ad hoc. By Chávez's initiative and with the
National Assembly approval 2007 saw the modification of laws governing the
distribution of petroleum revenues, 50% of these, which were previously
directed to state and municipal governments, now go directly to the banks of
the Community Councils.[6]
This legally embedded transfer of funds is a part of creating the new
Venezuelan state.

Yet if the Bolivarian
government is serious about the creation of a participatory state to match the
participatory society envisioned in the constitution,[7]
it must eliminate these kinds of inconsistencies. Funding must be stably
assigned to communities across the entire country from central government as
well as local, so that they do not need or receive ad hoc transfers and thereby
avoid the complication of electoral politics. This needs to be accompanied by a
concerted information campaign to address public (mis?)conceptions of the
Community Councils.

The survival prospects
of the councils depend on their ability to implement meaningful development
projects and thereby inspire participation. The embedding of funding in law
independent of hydrocarbons revenues is therefore made especially important
given declining oil money,[8]
which make further ad hoc transfers less likely and shrink existing council
income.

Only when all the
signals from government suggest that what we see is a sincere attempt to
transform the Venezuelan state will activists in their communities effectively
be able to argue against all comers that councils are necessary not simply
because money is available, but because money is the legitimate entitlement of
the community as a part of the state. The creation of Community Councils to
pursue development could be the same as the creation of a police station to
ensure public order, and it is this logic that holds the potential to win the
lasting loyalty of all sectors of Venezuelan society to the participatory
project.


[1] Estimates as to the number of councils vary from 20,000 to an
optimistic 30,000 - see http://www.zmag.org/blog/view/2239
for an example of the difficulties with official statistics

[2]
http://www.mps.gob.ve/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=65&func=fil...

[3] Compare the cases cited in 1 and 2

[4] These councils are supposed to direct municipal development but
have made little headway in the face of resistance from mayors, councils, and
poor conceptualisation - Municipio Libertador in Merida for example went
2 of its 3 years without a technical office - a major requisite of
effective functioning

[5] http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/3956

[6] http://www.mps.gob.ve/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=65&func=fil...

[7] Preamble to the 1999 Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela

[8] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7694757.stm