Venezuelan military spending – busting another anti-Chavez myth.

Opponents of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez have often liked to imply that under his rule Venezuela is engaged in a large scale military buildup, has increased military spending, and spends more than previous Venezuelan governments and other Latin American countries have. However, a detailed look at the numbers shows that this is yet another myth.

By Oil Wars
Topics
Short URL

Opponents of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez have often liked to imply that under his rule Venezuela is engaged in a large scale military buildup, has increased military spending, and spends more than previous Venezuelan governments and other Latin American countries have. Mainstream media reports have also served to reinforce this notion. Of course, like so much that the Venezuelan opposition and the commercial media say these numbers don’t hold up when the actual numbers are examined.

The examination of Venezuelan military spending is greatly facilitated by the fact that the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)just came out with its 2007 edition of its military spending handbook. The database on military expenditures is on line here.

This database provides a wealth of information on Venezuelan military spending across time including, for instance, that Venezuela spent $1.9 billion dollars on its military in 2006.

Of course, over time I’ve built up a healthy skepticism of the data provided by many of these international organizations and think tanks. So the first order of business would be to see if this organization's data is accurate. Given that the Venezuelan government is highly transparent this is a simple task.

The full accounting of Ministry of Defense expenditures for 2006 can be found in its "Memoria y Cuenta" located here on the National Assembly website. On page 3 of the “Account” it gives the Ministry of Defense expenditures for 2006 as 1,977,179,179 thousand Bs for 2006. Dividing that by 2,150 Bs to the US dollar gives the dollar amount as $919,618,000.

That is more than $1 billion less than the SIPRI amount. Does that mean the SIPRI is fudging the numbers? Not at all. It means that the SIPRI was savvy enough to know that the Venezuelan development fund, also known as FONDEN, used some of its resources for military expenditures. Looking at the Ministry of Finance “Memoria y Cuenta” for 2006, which can also be found here, we see that the Ministry of Defense was give $1.09 billion for 2006.

Adding the two numbers we get $2 billion dollars. Taking into account that the SIPRI numbers were given in constant 2005 dollars, which would be slightly less than the 2006 numbers I just calculated, we can see that the number they give match the numbers given by the Venezuelan government and are accurate.

Having established the accuracy of the SIPRI numbers we can now see what those numbers show us about Venezuelan military spending patterns. First lets look at Venezuelan spending by year from 1991 to 2006:

This chart shows us that the year with the most military spending occurred not under Chavez but under a previous administration in 1993. In fact other pre-Chavez years, such as 1991 and 1997 also had very high levels of military spending. Just looking at the graph it appears that military spending has been less under Chavez than other previous governments.

But rather than just guess, lets quantify it as I have done in the following graph:

In this graph I compare average military expenditures from 1991 to 1998 against the average from 1999 to 2006 when Chavez was in office.

As can be clearly be seen military expenditures were HIGHER before Chavez came to office by almost $200 million per year. So much for the “militaristic” Chavez spending more on arms then his predecessors, he is spending LESS as is clearly shown by the numbers.

How could this be given that every time we turn around the media is talking about some huge new arms purchase by Venezuela? Simple. The media isn’t reporting actual purchases. What they are often reporting are possible deals, or rumors, many of which never materialize. Of course, given that much of the media has an anti-Chavez agenda they are only too happy to pass of this information as fact and never go back and correct it when it turns out to be erroneous. Its nice to have a "free" media - it would be even better if we had media with some integrity.

Next, lets look at Venezuelan military spending as a percentage of GDP:

Looking at Venezuela’s military spending relative to the size of its economy we can clearly see that prior governments spent a significantly greater portion of the countries resources on the military than has Chavez. Prior governments often spent around 1.6% to 1.8% of GDP on the military whereas Chavez has averaged around 1.3% to 1.4% - an unmistakable decline.

Given Venezuela’s many needs and unresolved social problems it is imperative that social spending be maximized and military spending be minimized. Clearly, opposition propaganda notwithstanding, Chavez has been successful in reducing Venezuela’s military spending.

Lastly, I thought it would be interesting to look at military spending for 2006 for a few other Latin American countries:

From this graph we see that of major Latin American countries only Argentina spends less than Venezuela. Colombia spends more than twice as much as Venezuela does as does, interestingly, Chile. Given what others are spending Venezuela’s military expenditures do not seem to be out of line.

So the next time you hear some opposition propagandist or sloppy New York Times reporter tell you that Venezuelan military spending is out of line and has increased significantly remember the following:

Under President Chavez military spending has been reduced both in real terms and relative to the size of the economy.

Venezuelan military spending is significantly less than that of many other Latin American countries
.

There may be countries where military spending has soared and is out of proportion to any conceivable legitimate need (a certain North American country comes to mind) but Venezuela is not among them. Yet one more anti-Chavez myth that doesn't withstand scrutiny of the actual numbers.