Skip to Navigation

News: Politics

2.5 Million Elect Venezuelan Socialist Party Candidates

Mérida, May 3rd 2010 (Venezuelanalysis.com) – Yesterday 2,589,852 members of the governing United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) went to the booths to elect their candidates for the National Assembly elections to be held on 26 September.

From 8am, or even earlier in some cases, registered members voted at 3,820 booths, selecting from a total of 3,527 nominations, though only voting for candidates that corresponded to their regional area. Any registered member could nominate themselves, for no charge.

The elections were managed by the National Electoral Council (CNE), an independent national electoral body. According to Justice Minister Tarek El-Aissami, the voting was quick, there were no irregular incidents, and all was done with in “complete normality.”

As President Hugo Chavez cast his vote, he said, “Electing candidates like this, we’re guaranteeing a much deeper connection between the National Assembly and the bases.”

Cilia Flores, president of the National Assembly, said, “This is a demonstration of what we’ll see on 26 September: A huge popular victory that strengthens the revolution and the leadership of President Hugo Chavez.”

And Farik Fraija, a political scientist, told ABN, “Never before in Latin American has such participation and commitment in the internal process of modern political parties been seen.”

Of the final 110 elected candidates, ten are youth, according to ABN, and 22 are women, judging by a count of feminine first names. Also, according to Fraija, 30% of the candidates are currently legislators who are seeking re-election.

Many of the elected candidates also currently have positions working for mayors or governors or in ministries, or are members of state political bureaus of the PSUV, while others do not hold any sort of political position.

Some of the more well known elected candidates include Aristóbulo Istúriz, vice president of the north east region of the PSUV and previously minister of education and sports; Freddy Bernal, ex mayor of Caracas; PSUV youth leader, Robert Serra; and Dario Vivas, a National Assembly legislator often seen in the press.

Julio Chavez, a mayor renowned for promoting and helping to build a participatory Municipal Constituent Assembly, was also elected, while Mario Silva, the well known analytical journalist and host of the TV show La Hojilla (The Razorblade) was not. Marleny Contreras, wife of minister Diosdado Cabello was also elected to be a candidate.

In Mérida state, all four nominees elected as candidates have previously held positions in the state or city mayor government, and have previously run in regional and local elections. One candidate is head of the Merida legislative council,  another lost PSUV primaries to run for governor, and a third lost PSUV primaries to run for mayor. All four will have to abandon political positions in order to campaign for their place in the National Assembly.

Opposition media response to the elections focused on what they considered a low turn out. The daily newspaper, El Nacional’s headline read, “PSUV elected candidates with an abstention of 62%.”

In response, William Lara, a national leader of the PSUV, said, “This is an internal election.. to make comparisons with presidential elections is really just lies.”

Opposition parties held unmonitored primary elections for 15 out of a total of 67 districts last week, with a turnout of less than 10%, according to opposition-aligned news media. Party leadership selected the rest of the opposition candidates.  

The national assembly has 167 legislators whose 5 year terms expire on 5 January 2011. The PSUV elected candidates for 110 of these spots on Sunday.

Published on May 4th 2010 at 8.22am

Comments

Venezuelanalysis uncritical

Although I appreciate the work that you guys put into making the site, I must admit that I'm quite tired of reading the borring copy-paste stories from ABN, VTV and RNV. I lived in Venezuela for five years and I've heard plenty of talk of the wonders of Chávez, but that doesn't really help the rank and fileers in the movement who suffer from the serious problems unresolved here.

The same can be observed in this completely uncritical "report". Not a word about the thousands of bureaucratic manoevers implemented to prevent the PSUV left from winning the elections.....

People searching for a more sober report can find it in Aporrea (unfortunately only in Spanish):
http://www.aporrea.org/ideologia/n156538.html

Venezuelanalysis is critical and analytical!

Hi Patrick,

I appreciate your comment and feedback.
I think though that its a huge exageration or untruth to say that Venezuelanalysis is uncritical- one of our two main columns is devoted to analysis and opinion, and we update it daily, and see it as an essential part of the site.

We do however, draw a distinction between what is "news" and what is "analysis"" and when we write the news, daily, we try to be a little more objective- by that I don't mean objective in cause, we are clear which "side" we're on, but I mean objective in tone: presenting the "facts" quickly, and usefully, putting them in context, which is important, but ultimately the aim is to get the information out there and let the reader decide. Importantly, it is often information not being published at all by the mainstream press.

This doesn't mean we devalue criticism and analysis, this is what the other column is for.

In this article I actually used my own experience in Merida, as well as googling most of the 110 candidates to get my own impression of their composition. I did not depend on ABN, VTV etc.

I too was disappointed with the internal electoral process and will be including such comments in an upcoming analysis piece of mine on the issue of bureaucracy in Venezuela. We do however welcome any other contributions on the issue! Or, feel free to translate the aporrea article if you like. We are also looking for more volunteer translators :)

Tamara

A word on objectivity

Hi Tamara,

My post was perhaps a bit rough in tone, but nevertheless my critischism is well founded. Your distinction between "news" and "analysis" is not useful in this context. You cannot use it as an excuse for the seriously uncritical, officialist line in your news coverage.

I am not saying that you should use the news stories as a means of propaganda. What I am saying is, that you should at least REPORT that sizeable sectors of the party are reporting very serious violations of the regulations. Not saying that they were necessarily right, just saying that there are people who questioned the electoral process. That would be genuine...and yes, revolutionary, journalism. But simply putting out a microphone for the bureaucracy is not.

Your officialist line is damaging, exactly because it gives a one-sided, and thus LESS OBJECTIVE picture of events.

Patrick